|
Setting the record
straight... Dear Parents
and Community Members,
At a recent Board of Education meeting, a parent inquired as to why
we had discontinued our honors program, information she had heard at
a student soccer game. Though I am sure conversation and information
we receive on the soccer field is usually reliable, in this case it
was not. When parents hear a rumor, they should contact their
child’s building principal, the department supervisor, or the
Superintendent’s office to check on its validity. At no time have we
ever considered discontinuing our honors program or more precisely,
our upper level program. Recently, our middle school and high school
upper level programs have been expanded, and we expanded the upper
level program into our elementary schools. Our goal is, and has
always been, to give as many students as possible access to upper
level course work.
The names of our upper level programs are as follows:
- Elementary school level:
Challenging Expectations Program;
- Middle school level: Enriched
Program;
- High school level: Honors
Program, SUPA, Advanced Placement Program and College in the
Classroom.
Two years ago we opened the upper
level program to more students at the middle school. We also added
specific upper level classes in our elementary schools. We did this
for several reasons. First, the upper level program at the high
school was dying on the vine. Year after year, fewer students were
choosing to take our most rigorous curriculum and we had to stop
offering many college level and Advanced Placement courses. High
school teachers became very discouraged by the preparation our
students were receiving to handle the demands of college course
work.
When we began to analyze the data and research the problem, we
discovered that the structure of the feeder program for our upper
level course work and the way the curriculum was being delivered
needed revamping. The middle school was only producing one class of
upper level students in each subject area, with the number of
students benefiting from this program at approximately 27 in 7th
grade and 25 in 8th grade. To compound our concern, this small group
was not representative of our student body. When we reviewed the
data, there was only one Hispanic and one African-American child in
the program.
As we recognize that the world is changing, we need to understand
that what was once viewed as good college preparatory education has
also changed. The skills once needed to succeed in higher-level
course work needed to change. With all of this in mind, we saw the
need to open the program to more students at the elementary school
and middle school levels, and we needed to review how the curriculum
was being delivered.
We are very proud to report that not only have more students
challenged this rigorous course work successfully, we can also show
that this is one of the main reasons why we are now seeing much
higher scores on our New York State assessment.
I have carefully listened to the concerns of parents who feel that
their children have somehow been let down by this change that
occurred two years ago. Even after numerous explanations, it’s
becoming clear that the only way to address their demands is to
return to an upper level program that only serves a very small
number of our students. That is not an option. The issue at hand, as
I see it, is access. We do not agree that any student who has gained
access to our upper level program should be excluded from
participating in it, and we will not exclude students because some
parents deem that they are not appropriate for this level of course
work. That is a decision a particular child’s parent and
professional educators must make.
We all agree that our upper level course work needs to be rigorous
and should challenge students to grow. We should not lower our
standards, and I emphasize, that we have not. We also agree that
students need to be ready to succeed when taking this more
challenging course work. In addition, teachers have never been asked
to lower their standards and have received significant training in
this area.
In order to continue to share accurate information about our upper
level programs and to address the rumors that are circulating with
incorrect information, we will be offering two more public
opportunities for parents to learn about and discuss this matter.
There will be a Firehouse Chat at the Rock Hill Fire Department on
Thursday, October 25, at 7 p.m. Our upper level program and the
reorganization of Rutherford and Cooke Elementary Schools will be
the main topics of discussion. The Board of Education will also be
giving a presentation about upper level course work at its November
1, meeting at the Rutherford Elementary School starting at 7:30 p.m.
We are ready to listen and answer any questions you may have
concerning these very important issues. Everyone is invited and
encouraged to attend.
Sincerely,
Dr. Patrick Michel
Superintendent of Schools
Back |